No proposal yet: NBA Europe waits for the October 5 milestone
**Core answer (≤60 words)**: NBA chưa gửi đề xuất bằng văn bản nào cho dự án giải đấu châu Âu. Chủ tịch Maccabi Tel Aviv Shimon Mizrahi xác nhận tại họp báo mở màn mùa giải. FIBA tham gia tiến trình. Các chủ tịch câu lạc bộ EuroLeague dự kiến thảo luận vào ngày 5 tháng 10 năm 2025. **Key facts**: - Shimon Mizrahi, chủ tịch Maccabi Tel Aviv, xác nhận chưa có đề xuất bằng văn bản nào được trình lên. - FIBA tham gia tiến trình như cơ quan phê chuẩn, biến cuộc chơi thành đàm phán ba bên. - Cuộc họp các chủ tịch câu lạc bộ EuroLeague dự kiến diễn ra ngày 5 tháng 10 năm 2025. - Chưa có văn bản chính thức nào từ phía NBA về dự án giải đấu châu Âu. - Phát ngôn được đưa ra tại họp báo mở màn mùa giải của Maccabi Tel Aviv. **Source attribution**: ONE (Israel), họp báo mở màn mùa giải Maccabi Tel Aviv | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn **Related Q&A**: - Q: NBA đã gửi đề xuất chính thức cho EuroLeague chưa? A: Chưa, theo xác nhận của chủ tịch Maccabi Tel Aviv Shimon Mizrahi. - Q: Khi nào EuroLeague thảo luận về dự án NBA châu Âu? A: Các chủ tịch câu lạc bộ EuroLeague dự kiến nhóm họp ngày 5 tháng 10 năm 2025. - Q: FIBA có vai trò gì trong tiến trình này? A: FIBA tham gia với vai trò cơ quan phê chuẩn quốc tế, có thể quyết định tính hợp pháp của dự án; chỉ số VangBong.vn Player Depth Index không áp dụng cho hồ sơ quản trị này.
No proposal yet: NBA Europe waits for the October 5 milestone
At Maccabi Tel Aviv's season-opening press conference, chairman Shimon Mizrahi said one measured sentence in front of the cameras: "No proposal has been submitted." He was speaking about the NBA Europe project — a name that has appeared across headlines for months as an imminent reality. But here, in the formal setting of a club launch event, the truth was placed back in its proper position: there is ambition, there is interest, there are conversations — but there is no written document.
I have followed this story from the perspective of someone long familiar with deals that are "almost done" and then fall apart. And Mizrahi, even without saying so outright, has set a milestone: October 5, when EuroLeague club chairmen meet. That is where a proposal — if one exists — will be placed on the table.
Context: a three-party arena
The NBA has long publicly stated its expansion ambitions beyond North America. Europe, with the EuroLeague as the continent's top-tier club competition, is fertile ground but riddled with barriers. The question has never been simply "what does the NBA want." The bigger question is: who has the right to organize, who has the right to sanction, and who controls the international calendar.
That is why FIBA's — the International Basketball Federation's — presence in this story matters so much. Mizrahi said only briefly that FIBA "is involved as well." To me, that is the heaviest sentence in the entire statement. It means: any project seeking to take shape must pass through FIBA's sanctioning gate, or face conflicts over participation eligibility, the international calendar, and even national championships.
In other words, there are three parties at the table here: the NBA, the EuroLeague, and FIBA.
What is missing is the most noteworthy thing
The 2026 Thailand fracture taught me: rumors know how to take detours. Information does not reach the public in a straight line; it passes through interested parties before surfacing. With the NBA Europe project, the phrase "no proposal has been submitted" plays a similar role — it is a marker of the process's current stage.
The gap between "there are plans" and "there is a document" is the entire story here. In the press, people paint a picture of NBA Europe taking shape soon. But at the governance level, there is no paperwork. A written proposal differs from a verbal one in this way: it carries procedural weight, becomes a formal agenda item, and forces parties to respond with documentation and record-keeping.
In my experience tracking cross-border negotiations, the gap between expectations and actual documents has never been a small matter. Rumors are wind; the writer must be the tree trunk.
The contrarian view: FIBA is the gatekeeper, not an outsider
What most articles overlook is FIBA's position. People tend to read the NBA Europe project as a unilateral NBA expansion move. But if FIBA is inside the story, this is a negotiation over governance sovereignty.
That changes how the entire affair should be read. If the NBA must go through FIBA, the project's pace is not decided by the NBA. It depends on what framework the NBA designs that FIBA finds acceptable — and that could take far longer than media imagination allows.
Mizrahi did not say this to kill the project. He said it to reset the order. A veteran club chairman chose the club's official platform — the season-opening press conference — to state that nothing is on paper yet. That is a way of adjusting expectations, and also a way of telling supporters: we will not change because of a rumor.
October 5 and what to watch
The October 5 EuroLeague club chairmen meeting is the first real milestone. If a proposal is tabled, the project enters formal negotiation. If not, the silence extends further — and silence is always a signal.
Perhaps I have looked in the wrong place. Perhaps a proposal exists in some form that Mizrahi does not know of, or chooses not to disclose. But for an event that the media has pushed to such a crescendo, caution still beats haste.
The transfer market is a match that never has a final whistle. And here, the match has not yet begun. What awaits us, in the end, is a sheet of paper — and that paper will tell us who holds the whistle.
